Sunday, July 26, 2026

Gary Barlow says he’s ‘fallen off a cliff’ after The Circus Live tour

Gary Barlow has opened up about the emotional crash he’s been dealing with since Take That’s The Circus Live tour came to...

Latest Posts

Andrew Ridgeley was relieved to escape scrutiny after Wham!

Andrew Ridgeley was "glad to get away" from Wham!'s fame. The 63-year-old singer admitted it was an "immense relief"...

Kacey Musgraves baffles fans with mystery cancellation

Kacey Musgraves has left fans baffled after cancelling a string of tour dates without explanation. The 37-year-old star had...

Niall Horan surprised Ella Bright with Off Campus duet

Niall Horan surprised Ella Bright with a duet of Baby Now That I Found You. The former One Direction...

Charli xcx’s top five songs

Charli xcx has shared her top five songs from her own archive. The 33-year-old star – who has just...

Joey Jordison’s estate settles Slipknot lawsuit

Joey Jordison’s estate has settled its lawsuit against Slipknot.

Earlier this year, it was revealed that the heavy metal group were being sued by the estate of their late original drummer – who passed away in July 2021 at the age of 46 – for allegedly profiting from his death.

A lawsuit, filed last June, accused the ‘Snuff’ rockers of using his name and personal belongings for Knotsfest – the group’s touring festival – and alleged that they “lined their pockets with profit off of Jordison’s devoted fanbase.”

However, according to legal documents obtained by Blabbermouth.net, “a notice of unconditional settlement” was filed on September 17 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, along with a request for the case to be dismissed.

The suit named frontman Corey Taylor, 50, and percussionist Shawn ‘Clown’ Crahan, 55, and accused them of not fulfilling a “written agreement” to give back all of Jordison’s items.

It read: “After abruptly kicking Jordison out of Slipknot in 2013, [Corey] Taylor and Crahan expressly promised in a written agreement to return all Jordison’s belongings in exchange for Jordison’s promise to release certain claims against them.

“The agreement contained a non-exclusive list of broad categories of items that [Taylor and Crahan] represented were in their possession and that they would return to Jordison. [Taylor and Crahan] purported to comply with the agreement by returning certain items to Jordison but, unbeknownst to Jordison, [they] had executed the agreement with no intention of performing their obligations thereunder, and knowingly concealed from Jordison that they possessed numerous other items belonging to Jordison that they never returned to him.”

The document went on to describe the harsh firing of Jordison in 2013, and alleged that the pair “handsomely profited” from his efforts to make Slipknot a “metal sensation”.

It continued: “The callousness of Jordison’s firing and other mistreatment at the hands of Crahan and Taylor have been widely reported and criticised by fans of the band. Since the 1990s, Jordison had dedicated his life to making Slipknot a metal sensation, from which Crahan and Taylor handsomely profited. It made no sense why Crahan and Taylor would treat Jordison with such disdain, especially in light of Jordison’s declining health.”

The estate also claimed the pair made a “blatant lie” about contacting the family to offer their condolences following Jordison’s passing.

The suit added: “Perhaps worst of all, Crahan and Taylor publicly lied to fans that they had contacted Jordison’s family to check on them and express their condolences and love for Jordison in the wake of his passing. This was utterly false, and deeply upsetting for Jordison’s family to read such a blatant lie on the internet. It is clear that Taylor and Crahan did not actually care about Jordison or his family; they cared only about drumming up publicity and sales of the new album.”

Slipknot denied all the allegations made against them and called for the case to be dismissed.

A statement from their legal representative at the time read: “Defendants generally deny each and every allegation and purported claim set forth in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and further deny that Plaintiff is entitled to any relief whatsoever.”

Latest Posts

Andrew Ridgeley was relieved to escape scrutiny after Wham!

Andrew Ridgeley was "glad to get away" from Wham!'s fame. The 63-year-old singer admitted it was an "immense relief"...

Kacey Musgraves baffles fans with mystery cancellation

Kacey Musgraves has left fans baffled after cancelling a string of tour dates without explanation. The 37-year-old star had...

Niall Horan surprised Ella Bright with Off Campus duet

Niall Horan surprised Ella Bright with a duet of Baby Now That I Found You. The former One Direction...

Charli xcx’s top five songs

Charli xcx has shared her top five songs from her own archive. The 33-year-old star – who has just...

Don't Miss

Mariah Carey planning festive European tour

Mariah Carey is planning a festive tour of Europe this year. The All I Want for Christmas hitmaker will...

Rush ‘in talks’ over Las Vegas Sphere residency

Rush are being lined up for a residency at the Sphere in Las Vegas. The Canadian rockers - who...

Fcukers’ ‘breakthrough’ year lands band an Independent Music Awards nomination

The Association of Independent Music has revealed the nominees for the 2026 Independent Music Awards. Cheekily-titled electronic group Fcukers,...

Sir Mick Jagger says ‘yes’ to another Glastonbury headline show

Sir Mick Jagger wants The Rolling Stones to make a Glastonbury headline comeback. The Rolling Stones frontman, 82, made...

Pixies declare Dave Grohl was ‘right’ about their ‘perfect’ album

The Pixies have backed Dave Grohl’s declaration their landmark debut album Surfer Rosa is “the perfect record”. Members of...

Stay in touch

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.